Aladdin Central Messageboard :: Post a reply
Aladdin Central Messageboard
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Aladdin Central Messageboard Forum Index
->
Disney
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Guest post code
Who is the main character of "Aladdin"?
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
[quote="Chaos"]I was reading on the web and it said the Golden age of Disney is over. I love computer animation but I only see crappy animation know. The golden age started with The Little Mermaid and ended with Brother Bear I despise Home on the Range to the depths of my soul. Not that I do not think that it does not have it's funny parts but that is not Disney Material. I am trying to figure out why stop with the animation. The Little Mermaid, Aladdin The Lion King, and Beauty and the Beast. Plus so many others have made a great deal of profit. Why can they not go back to animation. I remember when I saw Home on the Range. That Disney's Golden Age was over hopefully in the not so far future it will be reborn. By the way I am one of those feely good types. I love my avatar.[/quote]
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Aladdin
----------------
Aladdin
News & Updates
Fan Works
The Marketplace
The Skull and Dagger
About the Site
----------------
Site Feedback
Miscellaneous
----------------
Disney
Miscellaneous
Topic review
Author
Message
Chaos
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:40 pm
Post subject:
You know now that I think of it. It is hard to define a Golden Age. Many people think it started with the little mermaid to the lion king. Or it coul only be the movies that happened when Walt Disney was alive. But I think now that it depends on the person.
Some movies sequels could touch someone differently. Like I read that there was this woman who loved disney. But she found out she was going to die very soon. On her gravestone her husband wrote something along the lines of Thanks for being my beauty and thanks for loving a beast.
When I read that it really touched me and I thought every movie has an affect on someone different.
Vegitabeta
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:09 am
Post subject:
I just want to say that I didn't mind Atlantis, and I thought Treasure Planet was fine, we actually have both of them on dvd, so I'm not bashing them. It's just when you compare them to things like Aladdin and TLM, they just don't really stand up.
Emmlei
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 9:51 pm
Post subject:
Yeah, the falling short of potential is the only gripe I have with Atlantis. So much more could have been done, but it was the usual mix of time and resources (lack of both in development, to a degree, and on screen).
I like Lilo and Stitch because it's so non-traditional and I can relate to Lilo so well. It's just fun.
Syera
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:43 pm
Post subject:
I wanted to see Treasure Planet, but haven't managed to yet. After the
Sinbad
movie, I made a mental note to be cautious of movies that seem to fall off the planet shortly after release.
If I ever get the chance, I'd like to see it, though.
I can't say I
disliked
Atlantis... but I think they had a lot of wasted potential. Mostly, it was Þe Olde Standarde Pulp Plot with a lot of gratuitous Eye Candy. I don't mind eye candy, but when after it's said and done that's pretty much
all
I can remember, I don't usually feel really inclined to watch a movie again. That, and I'd pretty much felt like I'd seen it all before performed by Kurt Russell, James Spader, and Mili Avital. (And later by Joe Flanigan and Rachel Luttrell, who were
way
more entertaining than Milo et al.
)
I did manage to see
Lilo and Stitch
fairly recently - and I liked it. In fact, I wouldn't mind getting it sometime. Lilo's... unique sense of humor cracked me up.
Emmlei
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:17 pm
Post subject:
I liked Atlantis.
VampireNaomi
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:34 pm
Post subject:
Am I the only one who loved Treasure Planet? I never get tired of it, and it's one of my favourite Disney movies. Sure, it has its problems, but also some charm to make up for them.
Vegitabeta
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:27 pm
Post subject:
I think the last good 2D Disney movie was Lilo and Stitch, but I loved the golden age. Sadly, after TLK, things got worse with Herc etc, even though I do enjoy those...and then we were given Atlantis, Treasure Planet and Home on the Range...The only way is up!
dazzeling diamond
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:16 am
Post subject:
Again, I'm on board with this whole thing. I really do miss the princess stories, the good ol' love stories, those adventures, the mythology! All that stuff, classics...even the last few one's disney did, like Brother Bear and Lilo and Stitch, were in the old style animation...but didn't have the same feel, actually I liked Brother Bear, but Lilo and Stitch....not so much.
Emmlei
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:27 am
Post subject:
APK wrote:
Hmm...but all the movies people consider classics now weren't successful at the time of their releases. Sleeping Beauty nearly bankrupted the company. And there were a lot of other great movies that didn't receive recognition until a long time.
Yes, hence my parenthesis'd comment about them having a lot of good points. Sometimes it takes time to see things in a more appreciative light.
APK
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:32 pm
Post subject:
Hmm...but all the movies people consider classics now weren't successful at the time of their releases. Sleeping Beauty nearly bankrupted the company. And there were a lot of other great movies that didn't receive recognition until a long time.
Emmlei
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:19 pm
Post subject:
The whole "golden age" label can be tricky. For me, the golden age would be most of the films made directly under Walt Disney's direction/influence, with a lot of leeway in that definition. Namely, the earlier films, from Snow White to at least The Jungle Book. In regards to TLM through --max-- HotR, I'm more along the lines of AG's idea of the rennaissance, second golden age. But that's nitpicky terminalogy. Moving on.
I do agree that the 2D age has come to a momentary halt, but history repeats. A similar thing happened shortly after Walt's death. They were still making animated films, and they are not exactly their greatest stuff (but still pretty good in many ways. The worst, if you had to pin the term, would be The Black Cauldron). But TLM brought about a rebirth for the animation studios. Hopefully, Frog Princess will do the same. Of course, it'll take a lot more than it did with TLM; they simply changed buildings. It's more complicated starting again practically from scratch.
Shoujo
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:44 pm
Post subject:
Not only am I getting really tired of the 3D animation style, but I also feel that it is a pity that the film-makers of today feel the need to be so ironic *all the time*. It felt pretty new and funny in Shrek but now it's getting really worn out.
I miss the sentimental love stories of the old movies
Fidget Goblinweb
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:20 pm
Post subject:
They can't go back to 2D animation quickly cause when they decided that 3D was the way to go they sold all of their 2D euipment. Kept some of them to do the sequels in Austrailia but then closed that down along with the ones in Paris.
Janette Morgan
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:20 pm
Post subject:
Now they're going into the Disney Steam Age, where they just lurch around in the polluted atmosphere until they die at age 30 from vitamin D deficiency.
Nez
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:19 am
Post subject:
It's a known fact that history often repeats itself, so here's to hoping that there'll be an audience that will welcome 2-D animation once more.
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2002 phpBB Group